8/28/2023 0 Comments Hogwash san francisco menuSkinner and the rest of the town went bonkers. In 1991, ABAG (Association of Bay Area Governments – their equivalent of SLOCOG) assigned Berkeley a regional housing need of about 1600 units. Skinner, a former Berkeley councilwoman, represents not only Oakland, but Berkeley as well. Nancy Skinner, D-Oakland, strengthens the state’s 35-year-old Housing Accountability Act, known colloquially as the “anti-NIMBY (Not in My Backyard) Act.” Cities that don’t comply with a court order to allow development would be hit with automatic fines of $10,000 per housing unit. CEQA, the Coastal Act (and its rogue commission), greenhouse gas reduction requirements, groundwater restrictions, open space requirements, fish and wild life restrictions, and others have tipped the balance so far on the prohibition side that even if cities and counties wanted to lighten up, they would be sued to death by a host of interveners. The state has legislated so many barriers to housing production that it is absurd to blame the cities and counties. It targets cities that fall short, requiring them to approve more housing developments that fit the bill’s criteria until they are back on track. This bill aims to make it harder to ignore those goals. Currently, cities are told every eight years how many units they need to build to meet their share of regional demand - but they are not required to build them. Scott Wiener, D-San Francisco, will try to tackle the state’s housing-supply shortage. Of course issuing more debt will simply aggravate budget problems and divert funds from education and public safety. Like SB 2, it would pay for existing affordable-housing programs in California that used to be supported by funds from the state’s redevelopment agencies, a giant source of money that was slashed in the wake of the Great Recession and never replaced. Jim Beall, D-Campbell, will place a $4 billion statewide housing bond on the November 2018 ballot. If a permanent source of funding is needed, why not shift some of the natural growth of the income and sales taxes to set up the new fund? Why is the answer always a new tax? Half of the money it raises in the first year would go to programs to address homelessness. (Home purchases would not be subject to the fee.) It will collect $1.2 billion over the next five years - and would raise a total of $5.8 billion during that time, including federal, local and private matching fund, according to committee estimates. Toni Atkins, D-San Diego, will create a permanent source of funding for affordable housing, imposing fees of up to $225 on certain real-estate transactions, such as mortgage refinancing. These include new tax, fee, and debt measures as well as a not so subtle attempt by the state officials to shift blame to city councils and county boards of supervisors. 29 the Governor signed 15 bills designed to begin to “remedy” the State’s housing crisis. Symbolically and in an effort to appear to be reforming policy, on Sept. In effect the decade over decade accumulative state and local land use, fee, and environmental policies, along with attempts to fund countervailing subsidies, have created a system of government rationing of land and homes. Resultantly and since the late 1970’s, 120,000 fewer homes have been constructed throughout the state each year than are than are needed. The single-family freestanding house is regarded as a danger to the environment. A part of their program requires that people be forced out of their private cars and that they be required to live in dense, multi-story housing. That latter group, having had to abandon Marx’s dialectic of the inevitable self-destruction of capitalism, has pushed a proactive worldwide, national, and local agenda proclaiming that a socialist dictatorship is necessary to save the planet and humankind from the coming cataclysm created by industrial civilization. That is the wealthy coastal NIMBY elites, the no-growth environmentalists, and the more insidious global warmest/ social equity movement. Heretofore, the Democratic Legislators have catered, on land use matters, to those who created the housing crisis in the first place. We suspect that large Democratic donors in the high-tech sector and public employee labor unions, not to mention millions of Democratic voters paying $2,500 or more per month to live in decaying 50s and 60s era two bedroom apartments, are beginning to complain. The underlying cause of this sudden epiphany is not clear. After four decades of calculated indifference, Governor Jerry Brown and the Democratic State Legislators admitted earlier this year that there is a statewide housing crisis.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |